Display Kept in this browser only
Docket Yard
Ex ParteBefore the Surface Transportation Board

EP 669

Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/EP-669 · entries shown: all, newest first

INTERPRETATION OF THE TERM 'CONTRACT' IN 49 U.S.C. 10709

Caption from the Board’s record.

29 filings, 2 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 23:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC.

Cite View on stb.gov

Entries

By type (2)
Newest first · oldest first
  1. served (printed as 3/12/2008)
    Decision
    38557Entire Board
    DECISION DECLINED TO ADOPT A DEFINITION OF THE TERM 'CONTRACT' THAT HAD BEEN PROPOSED IN STB EX PARTE NO. 669 AND INSTITUTED A PROCEEDING SEEKING COMMENTS ON AN INFORMED CONSENT REQUIREMENT FOR CONTRACTS UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10709.
  2. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219923Reply
    Edison Electric Institute
  3. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219922Reply
    Csx Transportation Inc
  4. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219920Reply
    National Industrial Transportation League, E.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company, Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, Edison Electric Institute, National Grain And Feed Association, U S Clay Producers Traffic Association Inc
  5. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219919Reply
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  6. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219918Reply
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  7. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219917Reply
    National Industrial Transportation League
  8. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219916Reply
    National Grain And Feed Association
  9. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219915Reply
    John D Fitzgerald
  10. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219914Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Company
  11. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219913Reply
    Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation
  12. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219912Reply
    Bnsf Railway Company
  13. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219909Reply
    Dairyland Power Cooperative
  14. (printed as 8/2/2007)
    Reply
    219907Reply
    Western Coal Traffic League
  15. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219460Comment
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  16. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219459Comment
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  17. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219457Comment
    Bnsf Railway Company
  18. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219455Comment
    U S Clay Producers Traffic Association Inc
  19. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219454Comment
    National Grain And Feed Association
  20. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219453Comment
    Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation
  21. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219452Comment
    Entergy Services Inc
  22. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219451Comment
    Dairyland Power Cooperative
  23. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219449Comment
    Western Coal Traffic League
  24. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219448Comment
    Association Of American Railroads
  25. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219447Comment
    Edison Electric Institute
  26. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219446Comment
    Ameren Energy Fuels And Services Company
  27. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219444Comment
    E.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
  28. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219443Comment
    Csx Transportation Inc
  29. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219441Comment
    National Industrial Transportation League
  30. (printed as 6/4/2007)
    Comments
    219439Comment
    Canadian Pacific Railway Company
  31. served (printed as 3/29/2007)
    Decision
    37768Entire Board
    DECISION REQUESTED PUBLIC COMMENTS ON A PROPOSAL TO INTERPRET THE TERM 'CONTRACT' IN 49 U.S.C. 10709.