EP 665 (Sub-No. 2)
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/EP-665/sub/2 · entries shown: all, newest first
EXPANDING ACCESS TO RATE RELIEF
Caption from the Board’s record.
43 filings, 10 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 23:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 5/30/2025)Decision52526Entire BoardREMOVED A FINAL RULE CONCERNING FINAL OFFER RATE REVIEW BECAUSE THE FINAL RULE WAS VACATED UPON JUDICIAL REVIEW. THE BOARD ALSO TERMINATED THE PROCEEDING IN DOCKET NO. EP 665 (SUB-NO. 2).
-
served (printed as 1/30/2023)Decision51587--PROVIDED NOTICE THAT ON JANUARY 18, 2023, A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
-
served (printed as 1/4/2023)Decision51554--PROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON DECEMBER 27, 2022 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-
served (printed as 12/19/2022)Decision51387Entire BoardADOPTED A FINAL RULE IN DOCKET NO. EP 755 TO ESTABLISH A NEW PROCEDURE FOR CHALLENGING THE REASONABLENESS OF RAILROAD RATES IN SMALLER CASES. THE BOARD ALSO TERMINATED ITS PROCEEDING IN DOCKET EP 665 (SUB-NO. 2).
-
(printed as 5/24/2022)SubstitutionAssociation of American Railroads
-
(printed as 1/14/2022)Comments303538CommentIndustrial Minerals Association - North America
-
(printed as 1/14/2022)Comments303535CommentIndorama Ventures
-
(printed as 1/14/2022)Comments303521CommentNational Grain and Feed Association, The National Grain and Feed Association
-
served (printed as 12/29/2021)Decision51050Entire BoardBOARD DENIED A REQUEST TO HOLD DOCKET NO. EP 765 IN ABEYANCE AND REQUIRE CLASS I RAIL CARRIERS TO INFORM THE BOARD WHETHER THEY WILL CONSENT TO ARBITRATION OF RATE CASES IF ARBITRATORS ARE PERMITTED TO CONSIDER REVENUE ADEQUACY AS PROPOSED IN THE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING IN THAT DOCKET.
-
served (printed as 11/15/2021)Decision50444Entire BoardPROVIDED NOTICE OF A SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING TO MODIFY A RATE REASONABLENESS PROCEDURE PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED.
-
(printed as 12/14/2020)SubstitutionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/30/2020)SubstitutionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 10/8/2020)SubstitutionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/15/2020)SubstitutionCanadian National Railway
-
(printed as 1/10/2020)Reply300267ReplyNational Grain and Feed Association
-
(printed as 1/10/2020)Reply300266ReplyAssociation of American Railroads
-
(printed as 1/10/2020)Reply300264ReplyCanadian National Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/10/2020)Reply300259ReplyFarmers Union of Minnesota, Farmers Union of Montana, Farmers Union of North Dakota, Farmers Union of South Dakota, and Farmers Union of Wisconsin
-
(printed as 1/10/2020)Reply300258ReplySamuel J. Nasca
-
(printed as 11/14/2019)Comments248994CommentFarmers Union of Minnesota, Farmers Union of Montana, Farmers Union of North Dakota, Farmers Union of South Dakota, Farmers Union of Wisconsin
-
(printed as 11/12/2019)Comments248979CommentCanadian National Railway
-
(printed as 11/12/2019)Comments248974CommentAmerican Fuel & Petrochemicals Manufacturers
-
(printed as 11/12/2019)Comments248971CommentNational Taxpayers Union
-
(printed as 11/12/2019)Comments248966CommentNational Grain And Feed Association
-
(printed as 11/12/2019)Comments248959CommentSamuel J Nasca
-
(printed as 11/12/2019)Comments248952CommentGrowth Energy
-
(printed as 11/12/2019)Comments248936CommentCsx Transportation, Inc
-
(printed as 11/6/2019)Comments248827CommentJerry Ellig
-
served (printed as 9/12/2019)Decision47104Entire BoardDECISION PROPOSED A NEW PROCEDURE FOR CHALLENGING THE REASONABLENESS OF RAILROAD RATES IN SMALLER CASES.
-
served (printed as 3/28/2018)Decision45834Entire BoardDECISION WAIVED THE GENERAL PROHIBITION ON EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS IN EFFECT WHEN THIS PROCEEDING WAS INITIATED.
-
(printed as 9/14/2017)SubstitutionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/19/2016)Reply242290ReplyMontana Wheat And Barley Committee And Alliance For Rail Competition, Idaho Barley Commission;Idaho Grain Producers Association;Idaho Wheat Commission;Minnesota Farmers Union;Montana Farmers Union;Nebraska Wheat Board;North Dakota Farmers Union;North Dakota Grain Dealers Association;Oklahoma Wheat Commission;Oregon Wheat Commission;South Dakota Farmers Union;South Dakota Wheat Commission;Texas Wheat Producers Board;Us Glass Producers Transportation Council;Washington Grain Commission;Wisconsin Farmers Union;Wyoming Wheat Marketing Commission;Us Dry Bean Council;Us Dry Pea & Lentil Council
-
(printed as 12/19/2016)Reply242286ReplyNational Grain And Feed Association
-
(printed as 12/19/2016)Reply242285ReplyAssociation Of American Railroads
-
(printed as 12/19/2016)Reply242284ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/19/2016)Reply242283ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/19/2016)Reply242276ReplyCsx Transportation, Inc.
-
(printed as 12/19/2016)Reply242275ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/19/2016)Reply242274ReplyU.S. Department Of Agriculture
-
served (printed as 11/22/2016)DecisionDECISION GRANTED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 11/14/2016)Comments242044CommentNational Grain And Feed Association
-
(printed as 11/14/2016)Motion
-
(printed as 11/14/2016)Comments242041Comment, Alliance For Rail Competition; Montana Wheat And Barley Committee; Idaho Barley Commission; Idaho Grain Producers Association; Idaho Wheat Commission; Minnesota Farmers Union; Montana Farmers Union; Nebraska Wheat Board; North Dakota Farmers Union; North Dakota Grain Dealers Association; Oklahoma Wheat Commission; Oregon Wheat Commission;;South Dakota Farmers Union; South Dakota Wheat Commission; Texas Wheat Producers Board;;Us Glass Producers Transportation Council; Washington Grain Commission; Wisconsin Farmers Union; Wyoming Wheat Marketing Commission; And U.S. Dry Pea & Lentil Council
-
(printed as 11/14/2016)Comments242040CommentAssociation Of American Railroads
-
(printed as 11/14/2016)Comments242039CommentBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/14/2016)Comments242038CommentCsx Transportation, Inc.
-
(printed as 11/14/2016)Comments242037CommentNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/14/2016)Comments242036CommentUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 11/14/2016)Comments242035CommentLarry R. Miller, Jr., On Behalf Of Smart/Td General Committee Of Adjustment Go-386
-
(printed as 11/14/2016)Comments242034CommentU.S. Department Of Agriculture
-
(printed as 11/14/2016)Comments242033CommentAmerican Chemistry Council
-
(printed as 11/4/2016)Comments241963CommentSouth Dakota Department Of Transportation
-
served (printed as 8/31/2016)Decision44836Entire BoardPROVIDED NOTICE OF AN ADVANCE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING, WHICH SOUGHT COMMENT ON PROCEDURES THAT COULD COMPRISE A NEW RATE REASONABLENESS METHODOLOGY FOR USE IN VERY SMALL DISPUTES, WHICH WOULD BE AVAILABLE TO SHIPPERS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS AND ALL OTHER COMMODITIES.
Nothing of that kind in this docket.