Display Kept in this browser only
Docket Yard
Ex ParteIn EP 646

EP 646 (Sub-No. 3)

Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/EP-646/sub/3 · entries shown: all, newest first

WAYBILL DATA RELEASED IN THREE-BENCHMARK RAIL RATE PROCEEDINGS

Caption from the Board’s record.

16 filings, 3 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 23:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC.

Cite View on stb.gov

Entries

By type (2)
Newest first · oldest first
  1. served (printed as 3/12/2012)
    Decision
    41223Entire Board
    DECISION FORMALIZED ITS RULES WITH RESPECT TO THE THREE-BENCHMARK METHODOLOGY USED TO ADJUDICATE RATE CASE COMPLAINTS.
  2. (printed as 12/27/2010)
    Reply
    228537Reply
    Fertilizer Institute, National Grain And Feed Association, National Industrial Transportation League, American Chemistry Council
  3. (printed as 12/21/2010)
    Reply
    228514Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Company
  4. (printed as 11/24/2010)
    Comments
    228325Comment
    Csx Transportation Inc, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  5. (printed as 11/23/2010)
    Comments
    228311Comment
    Fertilizer Institute, National Grain And Feed Association, American Chemistry Council, National Industrial Transportation League
  6. (printed as 11/23/2010)
    Comments
    228310Comment
    Association Of American Railroads
  7. (printed as 11/23/2010)
    Comments
    228307Comment
    Canadian Pacific Railway Company
  8. served (printed as 10/22/2010)
    Decision
    40973Entire Board
    DECISION PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE BOARD IS REPUBLISHING ITS APRIL 2, 2010 PROPOSAL TO AMEND ITS RULES REGARDING THE THREE-BENCHMARK METHODOLOGY USED TO ADJUDICATE SIMPLIFIED RATE CASE COMPLAINTS, WITH AN EXPANDED DISCUSSION OF ITS RATIONALE AND REGULATORY OBJECTIVES. THE BOARD SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED RULEMAKING.
  9. (printed as 6/1/2010)
    Reply
    227197Reply
    Csx Transportation Inc
  10. (printed as 6/1/2010)
    Reply
    227196Reply
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Csx Transportation Inc
  11. (printed as 6/1/2010)
    Reply
    227192Reply
    Association Of American Railroads
  12. (printed as 6/1/2010)
    Reply
    227190Reply
    Interested Parties
  13. (printed as 6/1/2010)
    Reply
    227183Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Company
  14. (printed as 5/3/2010)
    Comments
    226945Comment
    National Grain And Feed Association, Alliance For Rail Competition, And Montana Wheat And Barley Committee, American Chemistry Council, The Fertilizer Institute, The National Industrial Transportation League, Consumers United For Rail Equity, American Forest And Paper Association, And The Glass Producers Transportation Council
  15. (printed as 5/3/2010)
    Comments
    226941Comment
    Association Of American Railroads
  16. (printed as 5/3/2010)
    Comments
    226940Comment
    Canadian Pacific Railway Company
  17. (printed as 5/3/2010)
    Comments
    226939Comment
    Csx Transportation Inc, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  18. (printed as 4/28/2010)
    Comments
    226907Comment
    Department Of Agriculture (Usda)
  19. served (printed as 4/2/2010)
    Decision
    40409Entire Board
    DECISION SOUGHT COMMENTS ON ITS PROPOSED RULES WITH RESPECT TO THE THREE-BENCHMARK METHODOLOGY USED TO ADJUDICATE RATE COMPLAINTS. THE PROPOSED RULE WOULD PROVIDE FOR THE RELEASE TO THE PARTIES OF THE UNMASKED WAYBILL SAMPLE DATA OF THE DEFENDANT CARRIER FOR THE 4 YEARS THAT CORRESPOND WITH THE MOST RECENTLY PUBLISHED REVENUE SHORTFALL ALLOCATION METHOD FIGURES. THE PARTIES WOULD THEN USE THE RELEASED WAYBILL SAMPLE DATA TO FORM THEIR COMPARISON GROUPS.