Comment EI-30439
Received or sent (printed as 3/24/2021)
I am submitting comments on behalf of one of my clients, PRR Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition. The Coalition wishes to stress that Conrail and its chosen developer did not act in accordance with the City's intentions as claimed by the OEA in its 2009 Environmental Assessment in the OEA's suggestions in connection with section 110(k) (anticipatory demolition). The Coalition submits 30 letter showing that Conrail acted in disregard, and contrary, to the City's intentions. City of Jersey City and Rails to Trails Conservancy affiliate with these comments and the evidence presented, noting that the letters further demonstrate an intentional violation of section 110(k) by Conrail.
Submitted by: Charles Montange, attorney, on behalf of Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition · Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition · Shoreline, WA
The Board publishes this comment in its environmental-comment table for this proceeding. It is quoted here as printed; nothing is inferred from it, and it states the commenter's own position in their own words, not this record's.
Permanent address docketyard.org/d/AB-290/sub/306X/comment/EI-30439
File docketyard.org/document/fa21a2e627c5d58b59a67f206084b6aff0c32671a63325eb6415f3d7a95a44c6.pdf · back to the docket sheet