{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T04:03:29+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":31460,"raw_docket":"NOR_42050_0","prefix":"NOR","sequence":42050,"title":"SOUTH-TEC DEVELOPMENT WAREHOUSE, INC., AND R.R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY--PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER--ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-11-15","date_printed":"11/15/2000","docket_raw":"NOR_42050_0","record_id":"30916","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"(1) FOUND THAT IC'S DEMURRAGE TARIFF IS REASONABLE AND MAY BE APPLIED TO THE INVOLVED TRAFFIC; (2) FOUND THAT THE LIABILITY OF SOUTH-TEC FOR THE DEMURRAGE CHARGES DEPENDS UPON WHETHER IT ACTED AS THE AGENT OF DONNELLEY WHEN IT RECEIVED SHIPMENTS AT ITS WAREHOUSE; (3) CONCLUDED THAT THE AGENCY QUESTION IS BEST DETERMINED BY THE COURT; AND (4) DISCONTINUED THIS PROCEEDING.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/1D81856F9744CF4F8525698C0076A64D/30916.pdf","label":"30916.pdf","document_sha256":"d630dc8d5e9f0e6a96044d78828d86d2d04a835b5fef9cde065ad374ab133443","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30916"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-02-18","date_printed":"2/18/2000","docket_raw":"NOR_42050_0","record_id":"30694","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Director Of Proceedings","summary":"(1) INSTITUTED A DECLARTORY ORDER PROCEEDING; (2) ORDERED THAT THIS PROCEEDING WILL BE HANDLED UNDER THE MODIFIED PROCEDURE, ON THE BASIS OF WRITTEN STATEMENTS SUBMITTED BY THE PARTIES; (3) INSTRUCTED ALL PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES OF PRACTICE AT 49 CFR SUBCHAPTER B, INCLUDING 49 CFR 1112 AND 1114; AND (4) ADJUSTED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/30A79BBCBC5D8077852568860052DA7D/30694.pdf","label":"30694.pdf","document_sha256":"3a97af5b8f99c3b6a7ccd0d57314f23fa34ba62e5d3178ae00824a9b17c02a75","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30694"}],"filings":0,"decisions":2,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T03:36:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:18:03+00:00","series":null,"printed":"NOR 42050","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/NOR-42050"}}