{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T00:55:26+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":31456,"raw_docket":"NOR_42031_0","prefix":"NOR","sequence":42031,"title":"PARRISH & HEIMBECKER, INC.--PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2001-05-25","date_printed":"5/25/2001","docket_raw":"NOR_42031_0","record_id":"31255","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"DENIED THE PETITION FILED BY CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., SEEKING RECONSIDERATION, AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, CLARIFICATION OF THE PRIOR DECISION SERVED IN THIS PROCEEDING.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/B051DF8C07DBBEB985256A480049078D/31255.pdf","label":"31255.pdf","document_sha256":"213cbf2a69c408843db2672a4eaf0e21b03611dbc6f927959aa368904fd88feb","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31255"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-06-14","date_printed":"6/14/2000","docket_raw":"NOR_42031_0","record_id":"31110","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"GRANTED CSXT'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION TO JULY 5, 2000.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/C63A151699DECB698525691A0050F661/31110.pdf","label":"31110.pdf","document_sha256":"1b002eb948404bc822b28c225d99da8edc6a60ae1b20f905f159ec3308382857","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31110"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-05-26","date_printed":"5/26/2000","docket_raw":"NOR_42031_0","record_id":"30695","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"FOUND THAT, EVEN IF CSXT'S ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION OF THE DISPUTED SURCHARGES HAD NOT BEEN FOUND TO CONSTITUTE AN UNREASONABLE PRACTICE, P&H WAS UNLAWFULLY ASSESSED, AND WOULD NOT BE OBLIGATED TO PAY, SURCHARGES ON THOSE SHIPMENTS THAT WERE ACCEPTED BY CSXT F.O.B. ORIGIN WHEN THE SECTION 7 NON-RECOURSE PROVISION OF THE BILL OF LADING WAS ENDORSED.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/D0990239B336B010852568D60076BF12/30695.pdf","label":"30695.pdf","document_sha256":"0ab4d397c515c3ba98d73d1dfa3fa17a1da847eb5476218b9bf211717d4eee6b","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30695"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-01-27","date_printed":"1/27/1999","docket_raw":"NOR_42031_0","record_id":"29284","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Director Of Proceedings","summary":"INSTITUTED A DECLARATORY ORDER PROCEEDING AND ALL PARTIES MUST COMPLY WITH THE RULES OF PRACTICE, INCLUDING 49 CFR 1112 AND 1114.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/E991F5F9774DD8698525670400502BB1/29284.pdf","label":"29284.pdf","document_sha256":"084aaa15097ef330de12c967ccae475b883410ea2b7f0b7b3f7398a7c5d04577","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/29284"}],"filings":0,"decisions":4,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T00:36:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:18:51+00:00","series":null,"printed":"NOR 42031","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/NOR-42031"}}