{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T04:06:08+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":26649,"raw_docket":"NOM_41290_0","prefix":"NOM","sequence":41290,"title":"THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY V. GROSS COMMON CARRIER, INC.","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-10-28","date_printed":"10/28/1999","docket_raw":"NOM_41290_0","record_id":"21190","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"FOUND THAT THE COLLECTION OF UNDERCHARGES ASSESSED BY GROSS AGAINST SHERWIN-WILLIAMS WOULD BE AN UNREASONABLE PRACTICE UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10701(A) AND SECTION 2(E) OF THE NRA.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/FD360481DE9C185F85256818004D808D/21190.pdf","label":"21190.pdf","document_sha256":"9ec223ea9c4b683ebd2a36d1d8030e9cae809073aa5a65408819c226fb829b6f","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/21190"}],"filings":0,"decisions":1,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T03:36:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:16:19+00:00","series":null,"printed":"NOM 41290","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/NOM-41290"}}