{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T08:06:22+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":26624,"raw_docket":"NOM_41265_0","prefix":"NOM","sequence":41265,"title":"SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CONSUMER HEALTHCARE V. JONES TRUCK LINES, INC.","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-04-01","date_printed":"4/1/1999","docket_raw":"NOM_41265_0","record_id":"20275","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"FOUND THAT THE COLLECTION OF UNDERCHARGES ASSESSED BY JONES TRUCK LINES, INC., AGAINST SMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, WOULD BE UNREASONABLE PRACTICE UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10701(A )AND SECTION 2 (E) OF THE NRA, AND DISCONTINUED THIS PROCEEDING.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/F94D26F0B120F25B85256732005B4862/20275.pdf","label":"20275.pdf","document_sha256":"6f6247f37ceb9a765b5ce69843b3fa464e3c00e47d0cdfbba86459b995fc3221","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/20275"}],"filings":0,"decisions":1,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T07:36:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:15:35+00:00","series":null,"printed":"NOM 41265","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/NOM-41265"}}