{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T06:09:44+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":26211,"raw_docket":"NOM_40819_0","prefix":"NOM","sequence":40819,"title":"UARCO INCORPORATED V. JAMES B. ORR AND FREIGHTWAYS EXPRESS, INC.","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-03-07","date_printed":"3/7/2000","docket_raw":"NOM_40819_0","record_id":"30865","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"APPROVED RECOMMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION TO DETERMINE AND CORRECT ERRORS IN JUNE DECISION BUT DO NOT OTHERWISE DISTURB FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN THAT DECISION.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/CEDED4DB0E422E578525689B004FAB65/30865.pdf","label":"30865.pdf","document_sha256":"0cf3e415d1c2bfefed801429c8816d411f3fd407db9a655f77ef10323e5d3905","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30865"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-10-29","date_printed":"10/29/1999","docket_raw":"NOM_40819_0","record_id":"30606","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/FE6AA6BFE85841F3852568170076489F/30606.pdf","label":"30606.pdf","document_sha256":"4334bfa0ae12e34d29f681a3cd7c70a8b34703a7f92030ca1c634db4ff6e7f8f","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30606"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-09-03","date_printed":"9/3/1999","docket_raw":"NOM_40819_0","record_id":"30481","type":"Notice Of Court Action","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 24, 1999, INVOLVING THE ABOVE-ENTITLED PROCEEDING.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/5D606D7BA751A496852567DA00693DF9/30481.pdf","label":"30481.pdf","document_sha256":"280018ed08140cfb37765292461338b34823f51a385bcc6dec3b1c8ec9d273f4","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30481"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-06-25","date_printed":"6/25/1999","docket_raw":"NOM_40819_0","record_id":"29176","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"FOUND THAT THE ORIGINALLY CHARGED RATES WERE APPLICABLE TARIFFS RATES AND THERE WAS A BASIS FOR UARCO'S COLLECTION OF OVERCHARGES UNDER ITS COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST FREIGHTWAYS.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/17658BBBE2FE11DA852567890074A296/29176.pdf","label":"29176.pdf","document_sha256":"963951df0b982c53bcb4ba0a9dd9f043591ca76a7004c4941092ff5e1d8f7f4e","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/29176"}],"filings":0,"decisions":4,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T06:06:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:17:02+00:00","series":null,"printed":"NOM 40819","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/NOM-40819"}}