{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T06:10:31+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":12556,"raw_docket":"FD_33388_92","prefix":"FD","sequence":33388,"title":"CSX CORPORATION AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY--CONTROL AND OPERATING LEASES/AGREEMENTS--CONRAIL, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (ARBITRATION REVIEW)","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2001-03-09","date_printed":"3/9/2001","docket_raw":"FD_33388_92","record_id":"31713","type":"Notice Of Court Action","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT MARCH 2, 2001, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/2E2AC7BFB46C41F485256A07007B27BF/31713.pdf","label":"31713.pdf","document_sha256":"08d1512d5035e1cb47342bd74cc3cb6e2a362bed8daa008b34da786d3adb40cc","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31713"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2001-01-26","date_printed":"1/26/2001","docket_raw":"FD_33388_92","record_id":"30777","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"DENIED THE PETITION OF THE BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES TO VACATE AN ARBITRATION AWARD ISSUED ON JANUARY 14, 1999.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/D079F81A32F463D7852569CF0066AA14/30777.pdf","label":"30777.pdf","document_sha256":"a07dab74b905ce57fd397eb36a232dff3f8d7e1c56c6ef2094bdafaf1468eb78","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30777"}],"filings":0,"decisions":2,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T06:06:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:18:39+00:00","series":{"raw_docket":"FD_33388_0"},"printed":"FD 33388 (Sub-No. 92)","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/FD-33388/sub/92"},"series":{"raw_docket":"FD_33388","printed":"FD 33388","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/FD-33388"}}