{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-10T23:48:07+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":12475,"raw_docket":"FD_33386_0","prefix":"FD","sequence":33386,"title":"DECATUR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ET AL. V. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF INDIANA","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-12-08","date_printed":"12/8/2000","docket_raw":"FD_33386_0","record_id":"31509","type":"Notice Of Court Action","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 27, 2000, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/983AE41D430C3E3F852569AD005880C4/31509.pdf","label":"31509.pdf","document_sha256":"94fc958bfa507359dd0ede9ac977df4eda3d6ebacd8fa2bef8e27fdf25d4b407","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31509"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-09-29","date_printed":"9/29/2000","docket_raw":"FD_33386_0","record_id":"25498","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"(1) FOUND THAT CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF INDIANA: (A) DID NOT VIOLATE ITS STATUTORY DUTY UNDER 49 U.S.C. 11101(A) IN EMBARGOING TRACKAGE ON ITS SHELBYVILLE LINE AND (B) DID NOT VIOLATE THE PROVISIONS OF 49 U.S.C. 10701-04 IN PUBLISHING ITS TARIFF CIND-9010; AND (2) DENIED THE COMPLAINT AND DISCONTINUED THE PROCEEDING.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/95E7DC4599B080CC8525695A0060925A/25498.pdf","label":"25498.pdf","document_sha256":"9374ef1b4a703d967400987fab31f7a92a3f2627dcff43e59aab4192c5d03a05","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/25498"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1997-09-30","date_printed":"9/30/1997","docket_raw":"FD_33386_0","record_id":"27882","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"(1) INITIATED AN INVESTIGATIVE PROCEEDING, (2) DENIED SEVERAL MOTIONS, AND (3) ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/3E873F06297E85F88525654100706020/27882.pdf","label":"27882.pdf","document_sha256":"ec550ddc44e6920c8bc04a460260ab5da33b2620d55a414f92b32c10fc75996d","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/27882"}],"filings":0,"decisions":3,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-10T23:36:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:18:15+00:00","series":null,"printed":"FD 33386","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/FD-33386"}}