{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T04:58:49+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":12458,"raw_docket":"FD_33362_0","prefix":"FD","sequence":33362,"title":"PADUCAH & LOUISVILLE RAILWAY, INC.--CONTROL EXEMPTION--PADUCAH & ILLINOIS RAILROAD COMPANY","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-05-03","date_printed":"5/3/2000","docket_raw":"FD_33362_0","record_id":"31005","type":"Notice Of Court Action","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT APRIL 19, 2000, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/D4E6338347B3C90F852568CE006909D0/31005.pdf","label":"31005.pdf","document_sha256":"08cebddf9cc9f284b9abfaaf9ca564b26e8bdca0ee0caa3fe8f423b6d2dbb06e","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31005"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-03-17","date_printed":"3/17/2000","docket_raw":"FD_33362_0","record_id":"30447","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"DENIED P&L'S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE BOARD'S JULY 9, 1999 DECISION.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/0CDCCE6D7009D947852568930069F170/30447.pdf","label":"30447.pdf","document_sha256":"7ca0d148c46e3826dbcfca118a9cfd094cbe34456294e0fd2f92f2e1e8e1df13","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30447"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-07-09","date_printed":"7/9/1999","docket_raw":"FD_33362_0","record_id":"29922","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"(1) DENIED THE PETITION OF P&L FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OR OTHERWISE TO ESTABLISH TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR AN OPERATING AGREEMENT; AND (2) DISMISSED THE MOTIONS OF P&L TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND TO STAY A DUE DATE FOR REBUTTAL.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/87C2ACC6E9ED547E852567A1005B2559/29922.pdf","label":"29922.pdf","document_sha256":"5227362395c6a6afe5b6eddb85810fdec4fc2ed3bfce44115c49b13534a62d33","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/29922"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-02-03","date_printed":"2/3/1999","docket_raw":"FD_33362_0","record_id":"30019","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"HELD IN ABEYANCE ALL PROCEDURAL MATTERS PENDING FURTHER DECISION ON WHETHER TO INSTITUTE THE REQUESTED SHOW-CAUSE PROCEEDING.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/4C0ABDA3D6B41DCD8525670C00827DBB/30019.pdf","label":"30019.pdf","document_sha256":"9d742bcdc4e819342b8b58048a5544e8bcbac79a4d0dcc46718769318ab38e07","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30019"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1998-12-29","date_printed":"12/29/1998","docket_raw":"FD_33362_0","record_id":"29899","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"GRANTED IC'S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DUE DATE FOR REPLIES FROM JANUARY 6, TO JANUARY 21, 1999.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/72375FCC2E3CC73A852566E8005BAC18/29899.pdf","label":"29899.pdf","document_sha256":"711c32537b90d116636f6ba8f7dcf7e52795f508b82b18ca969db523e549d3ec","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/29899"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1997-08-25","date_printed":"8/25/1997","docket_raw":"FD_33362_0","record_id":"21670","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"GRANTED THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION AND ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/60A8BE499DF8D3348525654100702760/21670.pdf","label":"21670.pdf","document_sha256":"182d193ab636474362ec82d170ec6ddf64fe1480e63bc3c8609dffbb7bed07f5","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/21670"}],"filings":0,"decisions":6,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T04:36:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:17:19+00:00","series":null,"printed":"FD 33362","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/FD-33362"}}