{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T04:18:50+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":11266,"raw_docket":"FD_32000_12","prefix":"FD","sequence":32000,"title":"RIO GRANDE INDUSTRIES, INC., SPTC HOLDING, INC., AND THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY--CONTROL--SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY (ARBITRATION REVIEW)","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2004-06-24","date_printed":"6/24/2004","docket_raw":"FD_32000_12","record_id":"34770","type":"Notice","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE BOARD INTENDS TO TAKE NO FURTHER ACTION IN THIS PROCEEDING AT THIS TIME.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/99D5FCC18ECA1C7785256EBD00655F65/34770.pdf","label":"34770.pdf","document_sha256":"dd74a0d8f47f2162256ca76c6b0a5470be3ffe497ed9facbd3e4da14d1ea09e4","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/34770"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2002-11-21","date_printed":"11/21/2002","docket_raw":"FD_32000_12","record_id":"33190","type":"Notice Of Court Action","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 8, 2002, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/7B4AF0615D36F23C85256C75007599DF/33190.pdf","label":"33190.pdf","document_sha256":"1da724333aed595d5b32ed4943bc5bff3072b2826e5f1494d3c06c1eb4dc90a3","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/33190"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2002-09-19","date_printed":"9/19/2002","docket_raw":"FD_32000_12","record_id":"31035","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"DECLINED REVIEW OF AN ARBITRATION PANEL'S AWARD FINDING THAT 310 OUTSOURCED MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SERVICE (DATA PROCESSING) EMPLOYEES ARE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER NEW YORK DOCK BECAUSE THEY WERE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THE 1988 CONSOLIDATION OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC WITH THE DENVER & RIO GRANDE.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/AD7A6A49460C8E2A85256A160066615E/31035.pdf","label":"31035.pdf","document_sha256":"465c3b7b95e8bf03aeb7a0da4efeb8d3872696b66705152618181a9bc40b5a87","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31035"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2001-06-06","date_printed":"6/6/2001","docket_raw":"FD_32000_12","record_id":"31882","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"ORDERED THAT THE BRIEFS FILED BY BOTH PARTIES AND THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE NOVEMBER 30, 2000 HEARING WILL BE KEPT UNDER SEAL AND NOT PLACED IN THE PUBLIC DOCKET, AND THE PARTIES WILL NOT OTHERWISE DISCLOSE THEM TO THE PUBLIC WITHOUT A FURTHER ORDER OF THE BOARD.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/57071F11F696361C85256A6200793B5A/31882.pdf","label":"31882.pdf","document_sha256":"ca88ccaf5bd1b61d05adb82b33017d81f07ba6846a2bfe25fed1666fef5f1833","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31882"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2001-04-20","date_printed":"4/20/2001","docket_raw":"FD_32000_12","record_id":"31816","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"GRANTS UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION, UNTIL MAY 15, 2001, OF THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OPENING STATEMENTS AND A CORRESPONDING EXTENSION OF THE DEADLINE FOR FILING REPLIES, UNTIL JUNE 14, 2001.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/2A78AE1AEC1877E185256A34004E1F6E/31816.pdf","label":"31816.pdf","document_sha256":"b7605621c69804f9cae835ff99de4ad0dfcaf6ebe95919655d2dad06ef647951","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31816"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2001-03-26","date_printed":"3/26/2001","docket_raw":"FD_32000_12","record_id":"31681","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"PERMITTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL FILINGS, GIVEN AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES, BOTH PARTIES WILL BE ALLOWED TO MAKE OPENING PRESENTATIONS, ARGUMENTS AND TO REPLY TO THE OTHER PARTY'S FILINGS.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/81CA20B19D4A794D85256A16006D6289/31681.pdf","label":"31681.pdf","document_sha256":"62807438924ac14e85af5e6d1f27dca1191adfc45986ca2366ba77ba7db82033","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31681"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-08-29","date_printed":"8/29/2000","docket_raw":"FD_32000_12","record_id":"31269","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"(1) HELD IN ABEYANCE PENDING NOTIFICATION TO THE BOARD BY UP THAT A NEW ARBITRATION RULING HAS BEEN ISSUED OR THAT UP WISHES THE BOARD TO PROCEED WITH CONSIDERATION OF THE APPEAL IT HAS PREVIOUSLY FILED; AND (2) ORDERED THE CARRIER TO TIMELY NOTIFY THE BOARD OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS CONCERNING THE ARBITRATION.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/EF95A68DDEBFC10D85256949006C2EE6/31269.pdf","label":"31269.pdf","document_sha256":"9b50b212871bccab08604e091e23dbdd933be0b650a284bc63a16ef45ea46f8b","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31269"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-07-05","date_printed":"7/5/2000","docket_raw":"FD_32000_12","record_id":"31034","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Commissioner","summary":"DENIED THE PETITION OF UP FOR STAY OF AN ARBITRATION PANEL'S AWARD.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/B4AF78CDE94CFD638525691A0051140F/31034.pdf","label":"31034.pdf","document_sha256":"271028e1549ea384a6f849a161c095d80aaa595d9f0abfe0489a1e365fca82e6","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31034"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-06-07","date_printed":"6/7/2000","docket_raw":"FD_32000_12","record_id":"31099","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"GRANTED SPEEC'S PERMISSION TO FILE ITS REPLY TO SP'S ARBITRATION APPEAL BY JUNE 23, 2000.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/EF1B08C79C460D428525691A0051144C/31099.pdf","label":"31099.pdf","document_sha256":"ae73938eb1f6bb2f0a1105ecc705066a4387d96c5033d145814106b151d68ba9","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31099"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-04-07","date_printed":"4/7/2000","docket_raw":"FD_32000_12","record_id":"30951","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"GRANTED SP'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE THEIR APPEAL TO MAY 10, 2000.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/73D6957A7599B38E852568B80052D730/30951.pdf","label":"30951.pdf","document_sha256":"74ff0f161cab515f60ce4986e1b2f91d24d86fae1bf9b84979e70d6896eb11b4","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30951"}],"filings":0,"decisions":10,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T04:06:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:24:15+00:00","series":{"raw_docket":"FD_32000_0"},"printed":"FD 32000 (Sub-No. 12)","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/FD-32000/sub/12"},"series":{"raw_docket":"FD_32000","printed":"FD 32000","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/FD-32000"}}