{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T06:09:29+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":6985,"raw_docket":"EP_689_6","prefix":"EP","sequence":689,"title":"SIMPLIFIED STANDARDS FOR RAIL RATE CASES--2013 RSAM and R/VC >180 CALCULATIONS","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2015-09-03","date_printed":"9/3/2015","docket_raw":"EP_689_6","record_id":"44683","type":"Corrected Notice","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Director, Office Of Economics","summary":"DECISION CORRECTED THE MOST RECENT REVENUE SHORTFALL ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY AND REVENUE-TO-VARIABLE COST GREATER THAN 180% (R/VC>180) RATIOS FOR THE CLASS I CARRIERS (FOR YEARS 2010-2013), AS WELL AS THEIR FOUR-YEAR AVERAGES, FOR USE IN THREE-BENCHMARK CASES.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/88AFD68E9EC436FC85257EB5004E4AF6/44683.pdf","label":"44683.pdf","document_sha256":"9ed384d03be2a38260750ec6ab987ed0e57bc622ce5bfaf76ebb3e8dbcf7aae7","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/44683"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2015-06-16","date_printed":"6/16/2015","docket_raw":"EP_689_6","record_id":"44559","type":"Notice","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Director, Office Of Economics","summary":"DECISION PUBLISHED THE MOST RECENT REVENUE SHORTFALL ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY AND REVENUE-TO-VARIABLE COST GREATER THAN 180% RATIOS FOR THE CLASSS I CARRIERS, AS WELL AS THEIR FOUR-YEAR AVERAGES, FOR USE IN THREE-BENCHMARK CASES.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/A36FCF95EAE9D49185257E66004388BA/44559.pdf","label":"44559.pdf","document_sha256":"34b38f890b0fac15d9b8227fd1fb09ff5628719a2cd90eae6d1e4694bcfa0a61","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/44559"}],"filings":0,"decisions":2,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T06:06:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:42:51+00:00","series":{"raw_docket":"EP_689_0"},"printed":"EP 689 (Sub-No. 6)","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/EP-689/sub/6"},"series":{"raw_docket":"EP_689","printed":"EP 689","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/EP-689"}}