{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T06:04:22+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":6930,"raw_docket":"EP_662_0","prefix":"EP","sequence":662,"title":"REVIEW OF LIABILITY OF MOTOR COMMON CARRIERS OF HOUSEHOLD GOODS","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2006-08-09","date_printed":"8/9/2006","docket_raw":"EP_662_0","record_id":"37255","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"1) PROPOSED TO MAKE THREE REVISIONS TO THE CURRENT RELEASED RATES ORDER (IN MC-999, RELEASED RATES OF MOTOR COMMON CARRIERS OF HOUSEHOLD GOODS) TO IMPROVE THE PROTECTION OF CONSUMERS WHOSE BELONGINGS ARE LOST OR DAMAGED IN INTERSTATE HOUSEHOLD MOVES; AND (2) RECOMMENDED A REVISION TO A REGULATION OF THE FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION TO CONFORM THE REGULATION TO A STATUTORY AMENDMENT.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/B5633881A66DEB5D852571C5006A966E/37255.pdf","label":"37255.pdf","document_sha256":"9a7f4886e8b4637b722f40630250b943a42b30e5adc0d3d5dc8d7d87323df174","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/37255"},{"kind":"filing","date":"2006-07-19","date_printed":"7/19/2006","docket_raw":"EP_662_0","record_id":"217091","type":"Comment","filed_for_raw":"Steven M. Sakamoto-Wengel","deciding_body":null,"summary":null,"attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/78432/85257CA7006C955B852571B00071FFCA/217091.pdf","label":"217091.pdf","document_sha256":"849ef74cf7dea8551002d61d29003f3cacf41db8457e1001b70c983681a2c74e","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"filed","url":"https://docketyard.org/filing/217091"},{"kind":"filing","date":"2006-06-22","date_printed":"6/22/2006","docket_raw":"EP_662_0","record_id":"216837","type":"Comment","filed_for_raw":"American Moving & Storage AssociationHousehold Goods Carriers' Bureau Committee, American Moving & Storage AssociationHousehold Goods Carriers' Bureau Committee","deciding_body":null,"summary":null,"attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/78432/85257CA7006C955B85257195006D7F20/216837.pdf","label":"216837.pdf","document_sha256":"1343461496d222f6d309644b8eecfa310fa470918275edbc4ef54577fb65b766","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"filed","url":"https://docketyard.org/filing/216837"},{"kind":"filing","date":"2006-06-16","date_printed":"6/16/2006","docket_raw":"EP_662_0","record_id":"216785","type":"Comment","filed_for_raw":"Inland Marine Underwriters Association","deciding_body":null,"summary":null,"attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/78432/85257CA7006C955B8525718F005702CF/216785.pdf","label":"216785.pdf","document_sha256":"ff9288afa486fc5410192e0b2a42b4c51199e2e3510eb5d5a818f035923bf6a1","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"filed","url":"https://docketyard.org/filing/216785"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2006-05-23","date_printed":"5/23/2006","docket_raw":"EP_662_0","record_id":"36981","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON THREE ISSUES THAT CONGRESS DIRECTED THE BOARD TO ADDRESS REGARDING THE LEVEL OF LIABILITY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY MOTOR CARRIERS THAT PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION OF HOUSEHOLD GOODS (HHG): (1) WHETHER THE CURRENT REGULATIONS PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION; (2) THE BENEFITS OF PURCHASE BY A SHIPPER OF INSURANCE TO SUPPLEMENT THE CARRIER'S LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY; AND (3) WHETHER THERE ARE ABUSES OF THE CURRENT REGULATIONS THAT LEAVE THE SHIPPER UNPROTECTED IN THE EVENT OF LOSS AND DAMAGE TO A SHIPMENT OF HGG.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/997A67A19247AC1685257171004EEC88/36981.pdf","label":"36981.pdf","document_sha256":"602dddff8ab3a5b45781f2e4a2817a6b99c4ac8e9e88544bfbbb8ed202076f87","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/36981"}],"filings":3,"decisions":2,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T05:36:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:28:23+00:00","series":null,"printed":"EP 662","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/EP-662"}}