{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T07:10:28+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":6839,"raw_docket":"EP_558_3","prefix":"EP","sequence":558,"title":"RAILROAD COST OF CAPITAL - 1999","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-06-12","date_printed":"6/12/2000","docket_raw":"EP_558_3","record_id":"31030","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"(1) DISCONTINUED THE ABOVE PROCEEDING, AND (2) FOUND THAT IN 1999, THE RAILROAD INDUSTRY HAD A COMPOSITE AFTER-TAX COST OF CAPITAL OF 10.8%, BASED ON: (1) A CURRENT COST OF DEBT OF 7.2%; (2) A CURRENT COST OF COMMON EQUITY CAPITAL OF 12.9%; (3) A COST OF PREFERRED EQUITY CAPITAL OF 6.3%; AND (4) A CAPITAL STRUCTURE MIX OF 35.5% DEBT, 62.7% COMMON EQUITY, AND 1.8% PREFERRED EQUITY CAPITAL.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/CC48B8837C12E4B38525691A00510AC0/31030.pdf","label":"31030.pdf","document_sha256":"2096bb3371d65c8e8419385df49fdf8f917d316ebbe69ba7d487514d2ea5035c","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31030"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-12-10","date_printed":"12/10/1999","docket_raw":"EP_558_3","record_id":"30643","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"INSTITUTED A PROCEEDING TO DETERMINE THE RAILROAD INDUSTRY'S COST OF CAPITAL FOR 1999.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/B7F95E500EA4608F8525683A0079EBAA/30643.pdf","label":"30643.pdf","document_sha256":"f7a7093479aca0922b8f1261242d0da7f21b4364c7798e0ced5540610a65e96c","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30643"}],"filings":0,"decisions":2,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T07:06:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:17:23+00:00","series":{"raw_docket":"EP_558_0"},"printed":"EP 558 (Sub-No. 3)","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/EP-558/sub/3"},"series":{"raw_docket":"EP_558","printed":"EP 558","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/EP-558"}}