{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T04:17:27+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":6819,"raw_docket":"EP_552_16","prefix":"EP","sequence":552,"title":"RAILROAD REVENUE ADEQUACY-2011 DETERMINATION","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2014-01-02","date_printed":"1/2/2014","docket_raw":"EP_552_16","record_id":"43499","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"DECISION FINDS THAT THREE CLASS I RAILROADS (BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, NORFOLK SOUTHERN COMBINED RAILROAD SUBSIDIARIES, AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY) WERE REVENUE ADEQUATE FOR THE YEAR 2011, MEANING THAT THREE OF THE CLASS I RAILROADS ACHIEVED A RATE OF RETURN EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE BOARD'S CALCULATION OF THE AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL TO THE FREIGHT RAIL INDUSTRY.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/DB459CF1419EDA3685257C54005176AD/43499.pdf","label":"43499.pdf","document_sha256":"602237b58e26e3d5676ca29a678d4f59562984e14b6efdaaf814185e868ace8e","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/43499"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2012-10-16","date_printed":"10/16/2012","docket_raw":"EP_552_16","record_id":"42676","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"DECISION FINDS THAT NORFOLK SOUTHERN COMBINED RAILROAD SUBSIDIARIES AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY WERE REVENUE ADEQUATE IN 2011.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/35E29A6BC9B1B3D785257A9900490A3E/42676.pdf","label":"42676.pdf","document_sha256":"1658bbb8be7d09cb92c373d4193e7710bae7537699340c0b969d5055c7272ca2","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/42676"}],"filings":0,"decisions":2,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T04:06:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:40:27+00:00","series":{"raw_docket":"EP_552_0"},"printed":"EP 552 (Sub-No. 16)","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/EP-552/sub/16"},"series":{"raw_docket":"EP_552","printed":"EP 552","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/EP-552"}}