{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T05:20:18+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":6704,"raw_docket":"EP_346_29_A","prefix":"EP","sequence":346,"title":"RAIL GENERAL EXEMPTION AUTHORITY--SELECTED COMMODITIES","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-07-26","date_printed":"7/26/2000","docket_raw":"EP_346_29_A","record_id":"31203","type":"Notice Of Court Action","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT JULY 11, 2000, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/9DF2CC39386D014785256926006E9633/31203.pdf","label":"31203.pdf","document_sha256":"005af21dff578d49c5a03f8beb2780baf5e7b8b3e6812b496cd6362c8d9dd4c9","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/31203"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-05-12","date_printed":"5/12/2000","docket_raw":"EP_346_29_A","record_id":"28578","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"FOUND (1) THAT THE DEFENDANT RAILROAD HAS MARKET DOMINANCE OVER THE TRANSPORTATION INVOLVED WITH RESPECT TO 15 OF THE RATES, BUT NOT WITH RESPECT TO THE RATE APPLICABLE TO THE TRANSPORTATION OF COKE, (2) THAT THE 15 RATES THAT ARE SUBJECT TO MAXIMUM RATE REGULATION ARE UNREASONABLY HIGH, AND (3) DIRECTED MAXIMUM REASONABLE RATES ARE PRESCRIBED AND REPARATIONS ARE ORDERED.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/3C2100064ADF78B98525691A0050B82A/28578.pdf","label":"28578.pdf","document_sha256":"a317ae0720a851747f42a7642b4b7b1c98a64b93bf1b0f9af8d411ce78fa9eb3","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/28578"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-03-11","date_printed":"3/11/1999","docket_raw":"EP_346_29_A","record_id":"30005","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"ADDRESSES TWO ISSUES THAT HAVE ARISEN REGARDING THE OPENING EVIDENTIARY SUBMISSIONS ON WHICH INTERLOCUTORY RULINGS HAVE BEEN REQUESTED.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/96AB9463EDA2C5B48525672900717D7F/30005.pdf","label":"30005.pdf","document_sha256":"cc93aa4be2f9701d184545384f40ff7683af6b82178405f30eb7cf58b14000be","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30005"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1998-09-21","date_printed":"9/21/1998","docket_raw":"EP_346_29_A","record_id":"29626","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"DESIGNATED JUDGE JOSEPH NACY AS THE ALJ IN THIS PROCEEDING TO RESOLVE ANY REMAINING DISCOVERY DISPUTES AND THE SCHEDULE AS OUTLINED, WILL GOVERN, UNLESS SUBSEQUENTLY MODIFIED BY ORDER OF THE ALJ OR THE BOARD.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/F7637346F122F0568525668300694E1F/29626.pdf","label":"29626.pdf","document_sha256":"d4fcb3c02aabc36a3de150fa3736825f57d7c009236505840177af5b65356e79","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/29626"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1998-08-31","date_printed":"8/31/1998","docket_raw":"EP_346_29_A","record_id":"29288","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"PETITION FOR PARTIAL REVOCATION OF EXEMPTION FOR COKE.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/4071BB182092FC5C85256666007709E0/29288.pdf","label":"29288.pdf","document_sha256":"6990fe79a3f044c207399c8ea7efb646e9803354597d281c1505d3859f37835d","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/29288"}],"filings":0,"decisions":5,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T05:06:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:17:31+00:00","series":{"raw_docket":"EP_346_0"},"printed":"EP 346 (Sub-No. 29A)","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/EP-346/sub/29A"},"series":{"raw_docket":"EP_346","printed":"EP 346","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/EP-346"}}