{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T05:04:35+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":6679,"raw_docket":"EP_290_2","prefix":"EP","sequence":290,"title":"RAILROAD COST RECOVERY PROCEDURES FACTOR","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-03-15","date_printed":"3/15/2000","docket_raw":"EP_290_2","record_id":"30901","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Secretary","summary":"(1) GRANTED WCTL AND AAR'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND (2) DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THE APPENDIX TO THIS DECISION.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/C52C4023E42F614D852568A100691495/30901.pdf","label":"30901.pdf","document_sha256":"0e0d8f0b8f61c0593a601c60f8465b9a6ccf3bbe785499927233edde476c74a1","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30901"},{"kind":"decision","date":"2000-01-05","date_printed":"1/5/2000","docket_raw":"EP_290_2","record_id":"30609","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"(1) GRANTED THE REQUEST OF WCTL TO INSPECT ALL RCAF WORKPAPERS USED IN DEVELOPING RCAF; AND (2) ORDERED THE AAR TO MAKE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION THE CONFIDENTIAL RCAF WORKPAPERS UNDER THE CONDITION THAT THE PROPRIETARY WORKPAPERS ARE SUBJECT TO A STANDARD PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TREATED AS 'HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL'.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/2AF5D0BFB33D63AE8525684D00692D29/30609.pdf","label":"30609.pdf","document_sha256":"7d17fda119c5651f2c724ae3b9422bab459f5053433e342aee5a76443cbd54d4","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30609"}],"filings":0,"decisions":2,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T04:36:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:16:59+00:00","series":{"raw_docket":"EP_290_0"},"printed":"EP 290 (Sub-No. 2)","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/EP-290/sub/2"},"series":{"raw_docket":"EP_290","printed":"EP 290","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/EP-290"}}