{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T05:20:40+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":751,"raw_docket":"AB_6_378_X","prefix":"AB","sequence":6,"title":"BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY--ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION--IN GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY, WA","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"1997-07-25","date_printed":"7/25/1997","docket_raw":"AB_6_378_X","record_id":"25392","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"DISMISSED (1) BN'S PETITION TO REOPEN, (2) UTU'S REQUEST FOR THE IMPOSITION OF LABOR PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS, AND (3) COUNTY'S REQUEST FOR A PUBLIC USE COND AND TRIL USE/BANKING.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/E563C94877A0F37E8525654800784023/25392.pdf","label":"25392.pdf","document_sha256":"9b63f67dccbca3d8fc6234d12b761109759508da4e91a94d98810855af449f0b","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/25392"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1996-12-06","date_printed":"12/6/1996","docket_raw":"AB_6_378_X","record_id":"21265","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Director Of Proceedings","summary":"--","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/C76DA10B945337888525654800783F95/21265.pdf","label":"21265.pdf","document_sha256":"e36bfa3dcb5937515e1205cd95aee71b6e17215cc2206b0b2e3e670b58b1054e","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/21265"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1996-11-04","date_printed":"11/4/1996","docket_raw":"AB_6_378_X","record_id":"20557","type":"Environmental Review","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis","summary":"--","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/A184FBB18DA8C11B8525654800787EA9/20557.pdf","label":"20557.pdf","document_sha256":"c0e5c852338525f1063dead34b9b1674376030ad6aa1126f9ee4d856e03bac73","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/20557"}],"filings":0,"decisions":3,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T05:06:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:11:23+00:00","series":{"raw_docket":"AB_6_0"},"printed":"AB 6 (Sub-No. 378X)","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/AB-6/sub/378X"},"series":{"raw_docket":"AB_6","printed":"AB 6","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/AB-6"}}