{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T11:28:28+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":5941,"raw_docket":"AB_561_0_X","prefix":"AB","sequence":561,"title":"RIO VALLEY RAILROAD, INC.--ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION--IN CAMERON COUNTY, TX","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-08-06","date_printed":"8/6/1999","docket_raw":"AB_561_0_X","record_id":"30235","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"EXEMPTED, UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10502, RVRI AND RVSC, FROM THE PRIOR APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS OF 49 U.S.C. 10903, FOR RVRI TO ABANDON AND RVSC TO DISCONTINUE SERVICE OVER, AN 8.808-MILE LINE OF RAILROAD IN CAMERON COUNTY, TX, SUBJECT TO STANDARD EMPLOYEE PRODECTIVE CONDITIONS AND SETS A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/6B4401E3C60F8EE0852567B3007163F2/30235.pdf","label":"30235.pdf","document_sha256":"d633028b4410c4948077c0292b0a7e96fa9f16f180ed1e678aa9fa5850537855","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30235"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-06-11","date_printed":"6/11/1999","docket_raw":"AB_561_0_X","record_id":"30186","type":"Environmental Review","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis","summary":"CONCLUDED THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/568B6C3B511447758525678B0053066F/30186.pdf","label":"30186.pdf","document_sha256":"9168e82d0b9f8c355aa4289a8317417d279b05e5b7297f2a8598d03f2e14e123","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30186"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-05-04","date_printed":"5/4/1999","docket_raw":"AB_561_0_X","record_id":"30199","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Director Of Proceedings","summary":"NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE EXEMPTION AND ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/C075DBAF4119B70685256760006BF649/30199.pdf","label":"30199.pdf","document_sha256":"ec150b48a9923e7c4bea5896b3a737bed068e05f981952e15b5a5b2d7e8de832","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30199"}],"filings":0,"decisions":3,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T11:06:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:16:07+00:00","series":{"raw_docket":"AB_561_0"},"printed":"AB 561-X","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/AB-561-X"},"series":{"raw_docket":"AB_561","printed":"AB 561","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/AB-561"}}