{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T01:49:33+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":5913,"raw_docket":"AB_549_0","prefix":"AB","sequence":549,"title":"CITY OF ROCHELLE, ILLINOIS--ADVERSE DISCONTINUANCE--ROCHELLE RAILROAD COMPANY","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-05-27","date_printed":"5/27/1999","docket_raw":"AB_549_0","record_id":"30161","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"GRANTED (1) THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER U.S.C. 10903 BY THE CITY OF ROCHELLE, IL, (CITY) FOR THE ADVERSE DISCONTINUANCE OF OPERATION BY THE ROCHELLE RAILROAD COMPANY OF SERVICE OVER 2.06 MILES OF TRACK THAT THE CITY OWN, AND (2) THE CITY'S ADDITIONAL WAIVER REQUEST OF OPERATING AND INFORMATION SHIPPERS STATEMENT; AND ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/F93ACE0F6F34CBFA8525676A00503766/30161.pdf","label":"30161.pdf","document_sha256":"900729df5f3cb42f61e9940bc75c6434dab14fb98af715c2ed39dcb566a548aa","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30161"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-03-08","date_printed":"3/8/1999","docket_raw":"AB_549_0","record_id":"30064","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Director Of Proceedings","summary":"NOTICE OF ADVERSE DISCONTINUANCE AND ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/11BD14601601C61485256728005B2BCD/30064.pdf","label":"30064.pdf","document_sha256":"1582fc24bef5f326ec3a9fb7a07c96c029ad4cff11ebdc0035862cb48c60b35f","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/30064"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1998-06-05","date_printed":"6/5/1998","docket_raw":"AB_549_0","record_id":"29228","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Director Of Proceedings","summary":"GRANTED IN PART, THE CITY'S WAIVER REQUEST, AND DENIED RRC'S MOTION TO STRIKE AND AMERICOLD'S OBJECTION.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/13C9B3D67251813785256618004D2371/29228.pdf","label":"29228.pdf","document_sha256":"20af10497b1a59b9d8c52c9a557cf9cc39088abbe5b4420b2c92e369f29e89c0","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/29228"}],"filings":0,"decisions":3,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T01:36:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:15:39+00:00","series":null,"printed":"AB 549","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/AB-549"}}