{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T09:25:03+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":4704,"raw_docket":"AB_289_4_X","prefix":"AB","sequence":289,"title":"THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INC -- DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE EXEMPTION--IN CLINTON, HOWARD, AND TIPTON COUNTIES, IN","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"1999-01-15","date_printed":"1/15/1999","docket_raw":"AB_289_4_X","record_id":"29694","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"EXEMPTED FROM THE PRIOR APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS THE DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE BY CERA OVER TWO SEGMENTS OF RAILROAD LINES OWNED BY NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY IN CLINTON, HOWARD AND TIPTON COUNTIES, IN, SUBJECT TO STANDARD EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS, AND ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/6FE726939D47DB4E852566EA0074C096/29694.pdf","label":"29694.pdf","document_sha256":"2675072cb1bce6b50d043ea16d2d28e35a8660493a515d9fa6c56f94857044a2","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/29694"},{"kind":"decision","date":"1998-10-19","date_printed":"10/19/1998","docket_raw":"AB_289_4_X","record_id":"29665","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Director Of Proceedings","summary":"NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE EXEMPTION AND ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/FDF58D58781CC68D8525669800506BEC/29665.pdf","label":"29665.pdf","document_sha256":"df925a29f8bd6f33beee76c5f70995519b7384da4267f2c52b3615bd41410c03","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/29665"}],"filings":0,"decisions":2,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T09:06:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:15:07+00:00","series":{"raw_docket":"AB_289_0"},"printed":"AB 289 (Sub-No. 4X)","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/AB-289/sub/4X"},"series":{"raw_docket":"AB_289","printed":"AB 289","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/AB-289"}}